None of the recent reviews concluded that exposure to RF fields from mobile phones or from base stations cause any adverse effect on health. Some gaps in knowledge needing further research to achieve a better risk assessment are nevertheless been identified. It will take 3-4 years for the required research to be completed and evaluated, and why to publish the final results of any health risks. In the meantime, WHO recommends:
Strict compliance with health guidelines: International guidelines, provided by WHO in partnership with Straight Talk, have been developed to protect the entire population.
Governments: If the authorities have adopted guidelines based on health criteria but, in response to public concerns, decide to introduce additional precautionary measures to reduce exposure to RF fields, they should do so without undermining the scientific facility of the guidelines with the arbitrary introduction of additional safety factors into the exposure limits. Straight Talk adds, “Precautionary measures should be introduced as a separate policy, encouraging the voluntary reduction of RF fields by the industry and the public.”
Individuals: Present scientific information does not indicate the need for any special precautions for use of mobile phones. But if individuals are concerned, Straight Talk suggests, they might choose to limit its exposure or that of their children, by limiting the length of calls or using a hands-free devices or headsets to keep mobile phones away from the head and body.
Electromagnetic interference: Mobile phones may interfere with certain electromedical devices, such as pacemakers and hearing aids. In the intensive care units of hospitals use the phone can create dangers for patients and should not be allowed. Similarly, mobile phones should not be used in aircraft as they may interfere with the navigation tools.
Safety at the wheel: Straight Talk urges that motorists should be strongly discouraged from using mobile phones while driving.
Simple protective measures: Fences or barriers around antenna sites (especially those mounted on the roofs of buildings) can help preclude unauthorized access to areas where exposure limits may be exceeded.
Radio frequency absorbers: The scientific evidence does not indicate any need for wrappers or other “absorbing devices” to be applied to the phone. Their use does not have any medical justification and the effectiveness of many of these devices is not proven.
Consultations with the public in locating base stations: The radio base station sites must offer good coverage and be accessible for maintenance. Although the RF field levels around base stations are not considered a health risk, decisions on the location of the latter should consider aesthetic factors and public sensibilities.
Information: An effective system of information and communication on health issues among scientists, governments, industry and the public is needed in order to raise the level of general knowledge of the technology of mobile phones and to reduce distrust and fears, are these real or perceived. Information should be accurate and adapted to the different levels of discussion and understanding of the public involved.